PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIHI vs. XBCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIHI vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NIHI

1D
0.56%
1M
2.77%
YTD
6.43%
6M
8.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBCI

1D
-4.22%
1M
-28.48%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIHI vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NIHI and XBCI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIHI vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NIHI vs. XBCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIHIXBCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

-0.73

+1.89

Drawdowns

NIHI vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum XBCI drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and XBCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIHIXBCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-29.12%

+18.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-29.12%

+28.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-8.31%

+5.94%

Volatility

NIHI vs. XBCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIHIXBCIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

67.05%

-51.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

67.05%

-51.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

67.05%

-51.97%

NIHI vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIHI vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, less than XBCI's 21.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
7.79%3.44%
XBCI
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
21.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIHI and XBCI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NIHI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NIHI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 21.42%, compared with 7.79% for NIHI.

NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XBCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.98% for XBCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIHI and XBCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer