NIHI vs. BTCI

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

NIHI (NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NIHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIHI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

NIHI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -27.54% return.

NIHI

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 7.52%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -8.62%
• 6M: -27.54%
• YTD: -27.54%
• 1Y: -39.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIHI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF	7.52%	4.89%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-27.54%	-21.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NIHI and BTCI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

NIHI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIHI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NIHI	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.84	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.41	—

Drawdowns

NIHI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIHI	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.88%	-48.42%	+37.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-46.42%	+46.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-16.57%	+14.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NIHI	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	39.98%	-24.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.07%	40.25%	-25.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	40.25%	-25.18%

NIHI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

NIHI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%, less than BTCI's 44.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	44.34%	36.46%	6.76%
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF	8.57%	3.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIHI and BTCI in my portfolio?

NIHI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NIHI or BTCI?

On fees, NIHI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NIHI or BTCI?

NIHI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NIHI or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.34%, compared with 8.57% for NIHI.

What is the main difference between NIHI and BTCI?

NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.99% for BTCI.