NICE vs. AGI
NICE (NICE Ltd.) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, NICE returned 3.87%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for AGI. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NICE vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's -27.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NICE has underperformed AGI with an annualized return of 3.87%, while AGI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
NICE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -22.99%
- 5Y*
- -18.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.38%
AGI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- -24.43%
- YTD
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.64M | $126.71M | $144.32M | |
NICE NICE Ltd. | $70.31M | $53.40M | $68.66M |
NICE vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | -12.61% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -27.72% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICE and AGI is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2003 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
NICE:
$5.79B
AGI:
$11.69B
NICE:
$8.52
AGI:
$2.76
NICE:
11.59
AGI:
10.07
NICE:
0.35
AGI:
0.07
NICE:
2.04
AGI:
5.32
NICE:
1.63
AGI:
2.44
NICE:
$3.01B
AGI:
$2.21B
NICE:
$1.98B
AGI:
$1.33B
NICE:
$841.27M
AGI:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICE vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
NICE
AGI
NICE vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NICE | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.09 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.30 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 0.70 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NICE vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than AGI's maximum drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICE | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.23% | -88.13% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -49.60% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.21% | -49.60% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.60% | -49.60% | -24.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.60% | -67.81% | -5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.64% | -49.60% | -19.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -37.77% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.66% | 21.26% | +7.40% |
Volatility
NICE vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
NICE Ltd. (NICE) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 11.71%. This indicates that NICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICE | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 11.71% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.99% | 44.49% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.76% | 54.01% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 41.86% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 48.43% | -14.86% |
Dividends
NICE vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
NICE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.47% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
NICE vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NICE vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NICE and AGI have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NICE has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs AGI's -88.13%.
AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NICE and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer