NHYM vs. XMPT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) and XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. NHYM is actively managed, while XMPT is passively managed. Over the past year, NHYM returned 8.84% vs 12.34% for XMPT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for XMPT.

Performance

NHYM vs. XMPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NHYM having a 2.83% return and XMPT slightly lower at 2.72%.

NHYM

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.37%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMPT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 6M: 3.73%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: -1.07%
• 10Y*: 1.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHYM vs. XMPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF	2.83%	3.25%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	2.72%	6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NHYM and XMPT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

NHYM vs. XMPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHYM

NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 62
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XMPT

XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 48
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHYM vs. XMPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NHYM	XMPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.72	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.55	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	1.82	+1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	7.48	+1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NHYM vs. XMPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XMPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHYM and XMPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NHYM	XMPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.72	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.42	+0.35

Drawdowns

NHYM vs. XMPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum XMPT drawdown of -35.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and XMPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NHYM	XMPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-35.24%	+29.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-6.57%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.61%	+8.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-8.82%	+7.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.60%	-0.65%

Volatility

NHYM vs. XMPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) is 1.34%, while VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that NHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NHYM	XMPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	2.91%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.65%	6.03%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39%	7.21%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.94%	9.35%	-3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.94%	10.36%	-4.42%

NHYM vs. XMPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XMPT's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NHYM vs. XMPT - Dividend Comparison

NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than XMPT's 6.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF	4.53%	4.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	6.31%	5.87%	5.35%	3.81%	5.12%	3.74%	3.79%	4.08%	5.05%	4.84%	5.35%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NHYM and XMPT in my portfolio?

NHYM and XMPT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NHYM or XMPT?

XMPT has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to NHYM (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYM dropped -6.11% vs XMPT's -35.24%.

Which ETF is better, NHYM or XMPT?

On 1-year performance, XMPT leads with 12.34% vs 8.84% for NHYM. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NHYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NHYM or XMPT?

Over the 1-year period, XMPT has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NHYM or XMPT?

NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NHYM or XMPT?

XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.

What is the main difference between NHYM and XMPT?

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 1.97% for XMPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.