NHMAX vs. RMUNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NHMAX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A) and RMUNX (Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund) are both mutual funds - NHMAX is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nuveen, while RMUNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX returned 3.34%/yr vs 3.59%/yr for RMUNX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHMAX charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RMUNX.

Performance

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than RMUNX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX has underperformed RMUNX with an annualized return of 3.34%, while RMUNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.59% annualized return.

NHMAX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 9.06%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 3.34%

RMUNX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NHMAX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A	3.38%	2.51%	5.36%	6.96%	-15.14%	9.71%	3.03%	11.96%	1.79%	11.90%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	1.92%	0.82%	2.37%	9.85%	-15.09%	6.83%	5.84%	13.22%	8.89%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and RMUNX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1999	0.71

The correlation between NHMAX and RMUNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. RMUNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHMAX

NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

RMUNX

RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 39
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NHMAX	RMUNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.65	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.54	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.24	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	6.22	+1.37

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the RMUNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and RMUNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than RMUNX's maximum drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and RMUNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NHMAX	RMUNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.60%	-36.55%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-3.29%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.29%	-10.10%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.65%	-21.81%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.22%	-21.81%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.95%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-3.25%	-2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.43%	-0.23%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) is 1.10%, while Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that NHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NHMAX	RMUNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	1.19%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	3.13%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40%	4.46%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.83%	6.64%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.69%	6.00%	+0.69%

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RMUNX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NHMAX vs. RMUNX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than RMUNX's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NHMAX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A	5.40%	5.84%	5.54%	7.10%	5.41%	4.49%	4.83%	4.77%	5.26%	5.20%	5.61%	5.39%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	3.12%	5.30%	4.81%	3.77%	3.03%	3.24%	3.32%	3.43%	3.40%	4.34%	6.01%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NHMAX and RMUNX in my portfolio?

NHMAX and RMUNX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NHMAX or RMUNX?

RMUNX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to NHMAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs RMUNX's -36.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.