PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NHMAX vs. AMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NHMAX vs. AMHIX

Last updated Apr 16, 2026

NHMAX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A) and AMHIX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX returned 3.48%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for AMHIX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHMAX charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for AMHIX.

Performance

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMHIX's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX has outperformed AMHIX with an annualized return of 3.48%, while AMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.

NHMAX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.38%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
3.48%

AMHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.65%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A		1.52%2.98%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund		0.80%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and AMHIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 1999

0.77

The correlation between NHMAX and AMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund

Often compared with NHMAX:
NHMAX vs. BATEXNHMAX vs. NHMRXNHMAX vs. NMZNHMAX vs. AHYMXNHMAX vs. PRFHXNHMAX vs. EWHYXNHMAX vs. HIMYX
Often compared with AMHIX:
AMHIX vs. AFTEXAMHIX vs. ORNAXAMHIX vs. AMUSXAMHIX vs. HHMIXAMHIX vs. LTEBXAMHIX vs. PRFHXAMHIX vs. VTEB

Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. AMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NHMAXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.60

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

4.24

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.62

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.30

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.05

7.64

+1.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the AMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and AMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NHMAXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.60

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.37

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.40

-0.55

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than AMHIX's maximum drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and AMHIX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NHMAXAMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-21.74%

-23.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-2.76%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-17.81%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-17.81%

-4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.41%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-2.13%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.01%

+0.28%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) at 1.19%. This indicates that NHMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NHMAXAMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.19%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

1.89%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

4.38%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.79%

4.81%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

4.51%

+2.17%

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMHIX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

NHMAX vs. AMHIX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than AMHIX's 3.98% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A		5.89%6.30%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund		3.98%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%