PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHMAX vs. FASEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than FASEX's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX has underperformed FASEX with an annualized return of 3.34%, while FASEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


NHMAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.51%
YTD
3.38%
6M
4.00%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
3.34%

FASEX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.49%
YTD
19.73%
6M
18.08%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
3.38%2.51%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
19.73%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and FASEX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1999

-0.01

The correlation between NHMAX and FASEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHMAXFASEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.55

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

16.56

-8.98

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FASEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and FASEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, smaller than the maximum FASEX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and FASEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHMAXFASEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-55.57%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-7.37%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.29%

-22.26%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-22.26%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-44.56%

+22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-8.92%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

2.01%

-0.81%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) is 1.10%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that NHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHMAXFASEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

4.30%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

10.44%

-7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

13.95%

-9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

18.08%

-11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

20.22%

-13.53%

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHMAX vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than FASEX's 12.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.25%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.40%5.84%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHMAX and FASEX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to NHMAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs FASEX's -55.57%.

FASEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHMAX and FASEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer