NHINX vs. NMANX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX).
NHINX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jan 31, 1992. NMANX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 1, 1979.
Performance
NHINX vs. NMANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NHINX vs. NMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | -0.78% | 8.39% | 7.94% | 9.92% | -13.02% | 4.42% | 6.27% | 13.90% | -2.63% | 5.09% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | -4.02% | 5.51% | 24.39% | 18.21% | -28.82% | 12.42% | 39.45% | 33.62% | -6.28% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHINX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than NMANX's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, NHINX has underperformed NMANX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while NMANX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.19% annualized return.
NHINX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
NMANX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NHINX vs. NMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHINX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NMANX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NHINX vs. NMANX — Risk / Return Rank
NHINX
NMANX
NHINX vs. NMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHINX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 0.43 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 0.76 | +1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.10 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.63 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 1.95 | +7.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHINX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 0.43 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.12 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.50 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.50 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between NHINX and NMANX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NHINX vs. NMANX - Dividend Comparison
NHINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than NMANX's 24.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | 5.96% | 6.43% | 6.80% | 5.38% | 4.37% | 4.67% | 4.73% | 5.22% | 5.63% | 5.00% | 5.33% | 6.38% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | 24.06% | 23.10% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 4.87% | 16.30% | 9.58% | 5.43% | 11.70% | 8.94% | 5.00% | 9.00% |
Drawdowns
NHINX vs. NMANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHINX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, smaller than the maximum NMANX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHINX and NMANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHINX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.47% | -72.14% | +42.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -17.71% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -38.10% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.85% | -38.10% | +15.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -13.21% | +11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -17.45% | +13.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 5.71% | -4.96% |
Volatility
NHINX vs. NMANX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) is 1.60%, while Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that NHINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NHINX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 8.86% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | 16.46% | -14.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 23.80% | -20.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.19% | 23.15% | -17.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 22.36% | -16.46% |