PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHINX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHINX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than NBSRX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NHINX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


NHINX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.70%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
4.59%

NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
1.17%8.39%7.94%9.92%-13.02%4.42%6.27%13.90%-2.63%5.09%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NHINX and NBSRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1994

0.29

Over the past year, NHINX and NBSRX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHINX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHINX
NHINX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NHINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NHINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHINXNBSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.71

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

11.66

+0.49

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHINX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHINXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.06

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.59

+0.52

Drawdowns

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHINX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, smaller than the maximum NBSRX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHINX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHINXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.47%

-53.74%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-10.03%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.89%

-16.28%

+12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-25.39%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.85%

-34.07%

+11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.94%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-7.06%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.32%

-1.77%

Volatility

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) is 1.14%, while Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that NHINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHINXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.94%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

10.48%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

13.19%

-9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

16.14%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

17.49%

-11.59%

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NHINX and NBSRX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

NHINX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

NHINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than NBSRX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
6.40%6.43%6.80%5.38%4.37%4.67%4.73%5.22%5.63%5.00%5.33%6.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHINX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to NHINX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHINX dropped -29.47% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHINX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer