PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFXS vs. PLTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXS achieves a 24.21% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 48.68% return.


NFXS

1D
0.09%
1M
21.28%
YTD
24.21%
6M
24.00%
1Y
64.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZ

1D
4.41%
1M
22.41%
YTD
48.68%
6M
76.10%
1Y
-35.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFXS and PLTZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFXS vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZ
PLTZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFXSPLTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.01

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

-0.53

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

-0.70

+6.34

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the PLTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXS and PLTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXS drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, smaller than the maximum PLTZ drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXS and PLTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFXSPLTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.37%

-72.51%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-67.51%

+36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.88%

-51.04%

+38.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.93%

-55.64%

+23.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.45%

51.01%

-39.56%

Volatility

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) is 7.74%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) has a volatility of 39.87%. This indicates that NFXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFXSPLTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

39.87%

-32.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.22%

76.47%

-50.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.81%

102.92%

-69.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.65%

101.96%

-67.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.65%

101.96%

-67.31%

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXS has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFXS vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
3.23%3.53%0.87%
PLTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFXS and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTZ has higher volatility (39.87%) compared to NFXS (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXS dropped -50.37% vs PLTZ's -72.51%.

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs -35.88% for PLTZ. On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs -35.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for NFXS and 1.29% for PLTZ.

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFXS and PLTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer