NFTY vs. EWS
NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - NFTY tracks the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index while EWS tracks the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFTY returned 8.13%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for EWS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWS.
Performance
NFTY vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFTY achieves a -9.70% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 8.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NFTY having a 8.13% annualized return and EWS not far behind at 7.91%.
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
EWS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
NFTY vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 8.22% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFTY and EWS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012 | 0.35 |
NFTY vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFTY
EWS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
NFTY
EWS
Consumer Cyclical
NFTY
EWS
Basic Materials
NFTY
EWS
-
Healthcare
NFTY
EWS
-
Technology
NFTY
EWS
Energy
NFTY
EWS
-
Consumer Defensive
NFTY
EWS
Industrials
NFTY
EWS
Utilities
NFTY
EWS
Communication Services
NFTY
EWS
Real Estate
NFTY
-
EWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFTY vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
NFTY
EWS
NFTY vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFTY | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.49 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 6.08 | -7.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFTY | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 1.32 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.44 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.15 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
NFTY vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFTY drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFTY and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFTY | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.67% | -75.00% | +27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.14% | -7.82% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -16.34% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -29.06% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.67% | -40.84% | -6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -0.70% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -21.88% | +12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 3.20% | +2.92% |
Volatility
NFTY vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 3.68%. This indicates that NFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFTY | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.68% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.57% | 11.45% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 14.73% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 17.25% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 18.03% | +2.69% |
NFTY vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFTY vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than EWS's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.79% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFTY and EWS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFTY dropped -47.67% vs EWS's -75.00%.
On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.13% vs 7.91% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.13% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.
NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFTY and 0.50% for EWS.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFTY and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer