NFRA vs. UTES

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFRA is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus. NFRA is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFRA returned 6.83%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for UTES. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.

Performance

NFRA vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's -1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 6.83%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.

NFRA

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 5.98%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 11.88%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 6.83%
• ALL TIME*: 6.90%

UTES

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.59%
• YTD: -1.07%
• 1Y: -3.98%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 14.97%
• 10Y*: 11.78%
• ALL TIME*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund	$3.34M	$2.60M	$4.28M
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	$11.16M	$10.04M	$13.72M

NFRA vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund	8.91%	18.42%	4.76%	8.96%	-10.11%	9.61%	2.24%	26.27%	-7.74%	15.92%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	-1.07%	25.71%	45.35%	-2.46%	0.80%	20.74%	-0.30%	25.48%	5.14%	14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and UTES is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.55

The correlation between NFRA and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NFRA vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFRA	UTES
Industrials	33.4%	-
Utilities	24.5%	100.0%
Communication Services	22.4%	-
Energy	9.1%	-
Real Estate	4.7%	-
Healthcare	4.5%	-
Technology	1.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

NFRA vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFRA

NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 7
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFRA vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFRA	UTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	-0.20	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	-0.14	+2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.98	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	-0.31	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.78	-0.65	+6.43

NFRA vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and UTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFRA	UTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-35.39%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-13.88%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.16%	-17.62%	+8.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	-20.40%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.49%	-35.39%	+2.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-10.30%	+8.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-5.54%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	6.72%	-4.28%

Volatility

NFRA vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 2.42%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFRA	UTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	5.50%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	16.19%	-7.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.38%	21.39%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.95%	20.74%	-7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	20.26%	-5.39%

NFRA vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFRA vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than UTES's 1.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund	5.68%	6.00%	3.33%	2.57%	2.28%	2.71%	2.22%	2.27%	3.06%	2.81%	2.98%	2.47%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.53%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFRA and UTES in my portfolio?

NFRA and UTES have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFRA or UTES?

UTES has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to NFRA (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs UTES's -35.39%.

Which ETF is better, NFRA or UTES?

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 11.78% vs 6.83% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFRA or UTES?

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFRA or UTES?

NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFRA or UTES?

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.53% for UTES.

What is the main difference between NFRA and UTES?

NFRA is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.49% for UTES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.