NFRA vs. RIFR
NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. NFRA is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, NFRA returned 13.70% vs 14.73% for RIFR. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.
Performance
NFRA vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than RIFR's 11.99% return.
NFRA
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.90%
RIFR
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.34M | $2.60M | $4.28M | |
| $131.11K | $117.29K | $147.83K |
NFRA vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 8.91% | 8.01% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.99% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRA and RIFR is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between NFRA and RIFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRA vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank
NFRA
RIFR
NFRA vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRA | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.28 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 6.92 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRA vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and RIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRA | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -6.80% | -25.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -6.80% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -1.21% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -1.62% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.24% | +0.20% |
Volatility
NFRA vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 2.42%, while Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRA | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 3.04% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | 8.91% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 10.81% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 10.69% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 10.69% | +4.18% |
NFRA vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRA vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison
NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than RIFR's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.68% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRA and RIFR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIFR has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to NFRA (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs RIFR's -6.80%.
On 1-year performance, RIFR leads with 14.73% vs 13.70% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RIFR has performed better with a 14.73% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.
NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.87% for RIFR.
They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.59% for RIFR.
RIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFRA and RIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer