NFLY vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -8.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.

NFLY

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: -7.89%
• YTD: -8.84%
• 6M: -15.99%
• 1Y: -27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: 4.91%
• 1M: 72.80%
• YTD: 192.40%
• 6M: 186.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF	-8.84%	-17.54%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	192.40%	34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLY and AMDW is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

NFLY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLY

NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 2
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLY	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLY	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	4.83	-4.19

Drawdowns

NFLY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLY	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.18%	-34.64%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.30%	0.00%	-32.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-14.66%	+6.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLY	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.67%	81.56%	-53.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.32%	81.56%	-53.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.32%	81.56%	-53.24%

NFLY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLY and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NFLY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.24%, more than AMDW's 28.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	28.98%	34.78%	0.00%	0.00%
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF	58.24%	61.53%	49.91%	11.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLY and AMDW in my portfolio?

NFLY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLY or AMDW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLY or AMDW?

NFLY and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLY or AMDW?

NFLY has the higher dividend yield at 58.24%, compared with 28.98% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between NFLY and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.