PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLX vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFLX vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 23.92%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.


NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%

CB

1D
0.38%
1M
1.55%
YTD
5.77%
6M
7.02%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%
CB
Chubb Limited
5.77%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and CB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.19

The correlation between NFLX and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFLX:

$345.34B

CB:

$129.48B

EPS

NFLX:

$3.09

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

NFLX:

25.99

CB:

11.58

PEG Ratio

NFLX:

1.03

CB:

0.80

PS Ratio

NFLX:

7.41

CB:

2.72

PB Ratio

NFLX:

11.09

CB:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFLX:

$46.89B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFLX:

$22.99B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFLX:

$26.91B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLX vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLXCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.17

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.64

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

3.73

-5.07

NFLX vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLXCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-50.99%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.35%

-9.36%

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.35%

-14.35%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

-19.26%

-56.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

-42.59%

-33.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.01%

-3.68%

-36.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.91%

-10.68%

-14.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.19%

4.11%

+21.08%

Volatility

NFLX vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Chubb Limited (CB) have volatilities of 5.85% and 6.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLXCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

6.08%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.58%

13.12%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.05%

17.67%

+15.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.09%

20.33%

+22.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.49%

23.69%

+17.80%

Dividends

NFLX vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.20%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NFLX vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
12.25B
1.88B
(NFLX) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLX and CB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CB has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs CB's -50.99%.

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer