NFLW vs. QDTE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE).

NFLW and QDTE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NFLW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. QDTE is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Mar 6, 2024.

Performance

NFLW vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NFLW vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	1.32%	-29.02%
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	-3.92%	19.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's -3.92% return.

NFLW

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: -23.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 21.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.

NFLW

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF

QDTE

Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLW	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.86	0.80	-1.65

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and QDTE is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NFLW vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.81%, which matches QDTE's 51.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	50.81%	38.89%	0.00%
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	51.17%	49.49%	32.09%

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.73%	-22.86%	-27.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.48%	-6.92%	-28.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-3.30%	-21.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.26%	19.37%	+20.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.26%	18.71%	+21.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.26%	18.71%	+21.55%