NFLW vs. DRAM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

NFLW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NFLW

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -7.21%
• 6M: -20.56%
• YTD: -26.22%
• 1Y: -48.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -8.82%
• 1M: -23.17%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-27.18%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	93.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and DRAM is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	-0.24

NFLW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFLW	DRAM
Communication Services	12.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-2.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	58.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	—	—

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -55.10%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.10%	-35.16%	-19.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.01%	-35.16%	-17.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.35%	-6.83%	-22.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.96%	97.73%	-56.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.30%	97.73%	-57.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.30%	97.73%	-57.43%

NFLW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.21%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	82.21%	38.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and DRAM in my portfolio?

NFLW and DRAM have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or DRAM?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 82.21%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between NFLW and DRAM?

NFLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.65% for DRAM.