NFLP vs. PBP
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. NFLP is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLP returned -37.65% vs 18.32% for PBP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.
Performance
NFLP vs. PBP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's 4.90% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBP
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
NFLP vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -18.61% | -1.54% | 53.24% | 13.96% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.90% | 8.49% | 19.83% | 6.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and PBP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NFLP and PBP has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
PBP
NFLP vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLP | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.60 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 3.52 | -4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 18.66 | -20.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLP | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | 2.68 | -3.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.35 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -43.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and PBP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.48% | -43.43% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.48% | -5.22% | -38.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -0.17% | -41.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -6.69% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.52% | 0.98% | +23.54% |
Volatility
NFLP vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.93%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 0.93% | +7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 5.53% | +22.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 6.87% | +26.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 11.86% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 13.66% | +15.22% |
NFLP vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLP vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.06%, more than PBP's 11.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 26.06% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.16% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and PBP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLP has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to PBP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -43.48% vs PBP's -43.43%.
On 1-year performance, PBP leads with 18.32% vs -37.65% for NFLP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBP has performed better with a 18.32% return vs -37.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.
NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 26.06%, compared with 11.16% for PBP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.29% for PBP.
PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and PBP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer