NFLP vs. ARCC
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, NFLP returned -37.65% vs -6.58% for ARCC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLP vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's -5.14% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCC
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- -6.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
NFLP vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -18.61% | -1.54% | 53.24% | 13.96% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -5.14% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 9.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and ARCC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
ARCC
NFLP vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLP | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.95 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.34 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -0.63 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLP | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | -0.36 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -43.48%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.48% | -79.36% | +35.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.48% | -19.35% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -13.66% | -28.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -9.10% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.52% | 10.48% | +14.04% |
Volatility
NFLP vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.94%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 3.94% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 14.71% | +13.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 18.40% | +14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 19.96% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 25.58% | +3.30% |
Dividends
NFLP vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.06%, more than ARCC's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.28% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 26.06% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and ARCC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLP has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to ARCC (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -43.48% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
ARCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer