PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFG vs. LEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFG vs. LEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NFG has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 7.52%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -12.01% annualized return.


NFG

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.21%
6M
-0.46%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
7.52%
ALL TIME*
9.48%

LEG

1D
-2.20%
1M
-16.02%
6M
-15.21%
YTD
-10.05%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
-29.16%
5Y*
-24.27%
10Y*
-12.01%
ALL TIME*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.50M$23.27M$28.03M
$58.89M$56.86M$61.39M

NFG vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
4.13%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
-10.05%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NFG and LEG is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.28

The correlation between NFG and LEG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFG:

$7.82B

LEG:

$1.34B

EPS

NFG:

$7.24

LEG:

$1.60

PE Ratio

NFG:

11.38

LEG:

6.13

PS Ratio

NFG:

3.07

LEG:

0.45

PB Ratio

NFG:

1.98

LEG:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFG:

$2.50B

LEG:

$3.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFG:

$1.23B

LEG:

$717.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

NFG:

$1.52B

LEG:

$433.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFG vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFG vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFGLEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.06

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

0.16

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.24

0.34

-0.58

NFG vs. LEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the LEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFG and LEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFG vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and LEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFGLEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-86.41%

+30.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-28.51%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.93%

-76.68%

+55.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.74%

-84.29%

+48.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-86.41%

+42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.63%

-79.20%

+65.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-19.84%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

13.72%

-2.29%

Volatility

NFG vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is 6.54%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that NFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFGLEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

11.32%

-4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

32.38%

-17.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

49.36%

-29.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

42.74%

-20.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

39.96%

-15.91%

Dividends

NFG vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison

NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than LEG's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
2.04%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.62%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%

Financials

NFG vs. LEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Fuel Gas Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NFG and LEG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to NFG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFG dropped -55.49% vs LEG's -86.41%.

LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFG and LEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer