PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFG vs. FUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFG vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly lower than FUL's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NFG has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 6.84%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.


NFG

1D
0.98%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
6.84%

FUL

1D
0.05%
1M
9.59%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.17%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
0.07%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFG vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
-2.59%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
7.83%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NFG and FUL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.30

The correlation between NFG and FUL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFG:

$7.27B

FUL:

$3.53B

EPS

NFG:

$7.46

FUL:

$2.88

PE Ratio

NFG:

10.40

FUL:

22.06

PS Ratio

NFG:

7.22

FUL:

1.02

PB Ratio

NFG:

1.90

FUL:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFG:

$988.24M

FUL:

$3.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFG:

$576.67M

FUL:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFG:

$1.41B

FUL:

$495.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFG vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFG vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFGFULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.10

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.57

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

1.77

-2.34

NFG vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFG and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFG vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, smaller than the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and FUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFGFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-68.25%

+12.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.45%

-26.97%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

-43.45%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.74%

-43.45%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-56.29%

+12.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.20%

-24.20%

+5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-18.76%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

8.68%

+0.99%

Volatility

NFG vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is 5.73%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that NFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFGFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

11.90%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

26.69%

-12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

34.83%

-15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

29.46%

-7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

31.13%

-7.10%

Dividends

NFG vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than FUL's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.49%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.76%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%

Financials

NFG vs. FUL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Fuel Gas Company and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
-651.51M
770.84M
(NFG) Total Revenue
(FUL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NFG vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Fuel Gas Company and H.B. Fuller Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
46.2%
31.3%
Portfolio components
NFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of -300.89M and revenue of -651.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

NFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 347.14M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.3%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

NFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 247.67M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in a net margin of -38.0%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NFG and FUL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUL has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to NFG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFG dropped -55.49% vs FUL's -68.25%.

FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFG and FUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer