NEXA vs. RING

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).

RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.

Performance

NEXA vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NEXA vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEXA Nexa Resources S.A.	19.66%	2.67%	23.25%	22.07%	-20.07%	-16.38%	28.63%	-28.32%	-37.43%	12.70%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	7.25%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	4.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEXA achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 7.25% return.

NEXA

• 1D: 7.19%
• 1M: -22.42%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 112.22%
• 1Y: 74.38%
• 3Y*: 19.85%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: —

RING

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -20.56%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 22.69%
• 1Y: 108.05%
• 3Y*: 48.58%
• 5Y*: 24.99%
• 10Y*: 17.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NEXA vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEXA

NEXA Risk / Return Rank: 78
NEXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NEXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NEXA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NEXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
NEXA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 93
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEXA vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEXA	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.33	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.52	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	3.64	-1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.62	13.06	-8.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NEXA vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEXA Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEXA and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEXA	RING	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.33	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.70	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.12	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NEXA and RING is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NEXA vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

NEXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than RING's 0.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEXA Nexa Resources S.A.	0.95%	1.14%	0.00%	2.64%	6.26%	3.36%	3.92%	6.46%	5.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.78%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Drawdowns

NEXA vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEXA drawdown since its inception was -85.01%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEXA and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEXA	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.01%	-79.47%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.31%	-30.11%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.86%	-47.94%	-14.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.63%	-20.56%	-13.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.26%	-47.75%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.15%	8.38%	+7.77%

Volatility

NEXA vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA) has a higher volatility of 25.06% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 18.16%. This indicates that NEXA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEXA	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.06%	18.16%	+6.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.95%	38.56%	+10.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.81%	46.62%	+8.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.69%	35.85%	+19.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.99%	36.85%	+22.14%