PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWZ vs. QIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWZ achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than QIDX's 7.83% return.


NEWZ

1D
-1.19%
1M
1.04%
YTD
7.09%
6M
5.45%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QIDX

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.28%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.85%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEWZ and QIDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.76

The correlation between NEWZ and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWZ vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWZ
NEWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NEWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEWZQIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.75

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

5.80

-4.64

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWZ and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWZ drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWZ and QIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWZQIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-14.99%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-6.92%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-1.29%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-2.24%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.09%

+1.79%

Volatility

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 3.01%. This indicates that NEWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWZQIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

3.01%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

8.53%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

11.15%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

14.54%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

14.54%

+1.30%

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWZ vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

NEWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NEWZ
StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
0.11%0.27%0.18%
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.85%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWZ and QIDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWZ has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to QIDX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWZ dropped -19.40% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

On 1-year performance, QIDX leads with 12.09% vs 4.49% for NEWZ. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QIDX has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NEWZ.

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.11% for NEWZ.

They also come from different issuers: StockSnips and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEWZ and 0.50% for QIDX.

QIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWZ and QIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer