NEWZ vs. BMVP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NEWZ (StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. NEWZ is actively managed, while BMVP is passively managed. Over the past year, NEWZ returned 8.00% vs 14.32% for BMVP. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NEWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.

Performance

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWZ achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than BMVP's 10.39% return.

NEWZ

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -3.23%
• 6M: 6.91%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 1Y: 8.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.23%

BMVP

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: 5.45%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 1Y: 14.32%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 9.67%
• ALL TIME*: 2.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	$49.65K	$64.59K	$60.35K
NEWZ StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF	$17.75K	$65.61K	$41.34K

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NEWZ StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF	7.33%	-4.08%	14.05%
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	10.39%	6.15%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWZ and BMVP is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024	0.63

The correlation between NEWZ and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NEWZ	BMVP
Financial Services	23.3%	16.9%
Technology	19.3%	16.4%
Industrials	19.1%	17.3%
Healthcare	14.4%	9.8%
Communication Services	10.2%	6.6%
Utilities	10.0%	5.4%
Energy	9.9%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	11.1%
Real Estate	6.9%	5.4%
Basic Materials	3.8%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.8%

Return for Risk

NEWZ vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEWZ

NEWZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
NEWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
NEWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NEWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NEWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NEWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 58
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEWZ	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.40	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	2.09	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	2.15	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	6.44	-4.76

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the BMVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWZ and BMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWZ drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWZ and BMVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEWZ	BMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.40%	-78.13%	+58.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	-6.45%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.92%	-1.56%	-2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-35.96%	+30.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	2.15%	+1.69%

Volatility

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) is 3.20%, while Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that NEWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEWZ	BMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.43%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.49%	7.30%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	9.97%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.65%	15.90%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	18.73%	-3.08%

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEWZ vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

NEWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BMVP's 1.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.72%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
NEWZ StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF	0.04%	0.27%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEWZ and BMVP in my portfolio?

NEWZ and BMVP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NEWZ or BMVP?

BMVP has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to NEWZ (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWZ dropped -19.40% vs BMVP's -78.13%.

Which ETF is better, NEWZ or BMVP?

On 1-year performance, BMVP leads with 14.32% vs 8.00% for NEWZ. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NEWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NEWZ or BMVP?

Over the 1-year period, BMVP has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 8.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEWZ or BMVP?

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NEWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEWZ or BMVP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.04% for NEWZ.

What is the main difference between NEWZ and BMVP?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEWZ and 0.29% for BMVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BMVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.