NEWZ vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NEWZ (StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEWZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by StockSnips, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. NEWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

NEWZ vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NEWZ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.68%
• 6M: 7.19%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 1Y: 7.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWZ vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NEWZ StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF	3.83%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWZ and BPH is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.23

NEWZ vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NEWZ	BPH
Industrials	22.5%	-
Healthcare	17.3%	-
Utilities	16.4%	-
Communication Services	14.2%	-
Energy	9.9%	100.0%
Technology	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	-
Real Estate	6.9%	-
Financial Services	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-

Return for Risk

NEWZ vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWZ

NEWZ Risk / Return Rank: 20
NEWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NEWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NEWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NEWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NEWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWZ vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEWZ	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	—	—

Drawdowns

NEWZ vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWZ drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWZ and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEWZ	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.40%	-15.58%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-6.78%	+5.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-6.73%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEWZ	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.06%	28.00%	-13.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	28.00%	-12.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	28.00%	-12.31%

NEWZ vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEWZ vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

NEWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BPH's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
NEWZ StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF	0.04%	0.27%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEWZ and BPH in my portfolio?

NEWZ and BPH have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEWZ or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEWZ or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NEWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEWZ or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.04% for NEWZ.

What is the main difference between NEWZ and BPH?

NEWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: StockSnips and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEWZ and 0.19% for BPH.