PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NETL vs. USRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NETL vs. USRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 17.65% return.


NETL

1D
0.72%
1M
0.70%
YTD
14.61%
6M
14.73%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

USRT

1D
0.14%
1M
1.97%
YTD
17.65%
6M
17.22%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NETL vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
14.61%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%-0.73%12.04%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
17.65%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and USRT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.89

The correlation between NETL and USRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NETL vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NETLUSRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.33

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

7.57

-3.14

NETL vs. USRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the USRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and USRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NETL vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and USRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NETLUSRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-69.92%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.04%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-18.70%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-31.03%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.11%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-12.94%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.50%

+0.42%

Volatility

NETL vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison

NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) have volatilities of 5.28% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NETLUSRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.19%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

10.05%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

13.82%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

18.93%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

21.32%

+4.55%

NETL vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NETL vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than USRT's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.65%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.57%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


NETL and USRT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NETL has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to USRT (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs USRT's -69.92%.

On 5-year performance, USRT leads with 5.39% vs 2.20% for NETL. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USRT has performed better with a 5.39% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.57% for USRT.

NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.08% for USRT.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NETL and USRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer