PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NESIX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESIX achieves a 80.79% return, which is significantly higher than NEAGX's 57.98% return.


NESIX

1D
-0.80%
1M
19.63%
YTD
80.79%
6M
75.73%
1Y
122.53%
3Y*
33.39%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

NEAGX

1D
-0.99%
1M
12.44%
YTD
57.98%
6M
57.43%
1Y
92.85%
3Y*
38.19%
5Y*
23.00%
10Y*
22.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
80.79%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
57.98%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NESIX and NEAGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.88

The correlation between NESIX and NEAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NESIX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NESIXNEAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.56

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.26

6.78

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.09

27.31

+2.78

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is comparable to the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESIX and NEAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NESIXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

3.68

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.94

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.66

+0.09

Drawdowns

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESIX drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESIX and NEAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NESIXNEAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-41.80%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-14.01%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-28.49%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

-36.31%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.99%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-8.67%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.47%

+0.65%

Volatility

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) is 8.84%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that NESIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NESIXNEAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

10.21%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.13%

20.45%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.29%

25.84%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.29%

24.57%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.44%

24.15%

+2.29%

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

NESIX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.35%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NESIX and NEAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NEAGX has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to NESIX (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESIX dropped -49.61% vs NEAGX's -41.80%.

NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 3.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NESIX and NEAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer