NERD vs. GFI
NERD (Roundhill Video Games ETF) is Gaming fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while GFI (Gold Fields Limited) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, NERD returned -8.66%/yr vs 33.83%/yr for GFI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NERD vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NERD achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -22.64% return.
NERD
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 6M
- -21.00%
- 1Y
- -27.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- -8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
GFI
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -20.24%
- YTD
- -22.64%
- 6M
- -26.59%
- 1Y
- 42.17%
- 3Y*
- 36.61%
- 5Y*
- 33.83%
- 10Y*
- 24.85%
NERD vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | -21.02% | 23.14% | 28.52% | 12.94% | -43.30% | -17.57% | 89.66% | 8.14% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -22.64% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 33.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NERD and GFI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.19 |
The correlation between NERD and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NERD vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
NERD
GFI
NERD vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NERD | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.16 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.91 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 2.37 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NERD vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NERD drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NERD and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NERD | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -88.05% | +22.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -46.66% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -46.66% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.08% | -56.22% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.78% | -45.09% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -44.24% | +8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 17.87% | +0.49% |
Volatility
NERD vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) is 4.44%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that NERD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NERD | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 20.41% | -15.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 48.15% | -33.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 61.46% | -42.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 52.73% | -28.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 54.92% | -29.46% |
Dividends
NERD vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
NERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than GFI's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.61% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | 0.80% | 0.63% | 1.74% | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NERD and GFI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to NERD (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NERD dropped -65.58% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NERD and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer