PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NERD vs. BJK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NERD vs. BJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NERD vs. BJK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
-13.51%23.14%28.52%12.94%-43.30%-17.57%89.66%6.91%
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
-15.50%4.15%-1.39%11.52%-12.83%-4.30%12.72%22.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NERD achieves a -13.51% return, which is significantly higher than BJK's -15.50% return.


NERD

1D
3.37%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-13.51%
6M
-24.97%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
-7.75%
10Y*

BJK

1D
2.82%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-15.50%
6M
-20.33%
1Y
-4.61%
3Y*
-5.58%
5Y*
-6.99%
10Y*
2.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NERD vs. BJK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NERD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BJK's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NERD vs. BJK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NERD
NERD Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NERD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NERD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BJK
BJK Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NERD vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NERDBJKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

-0.21

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

-0.17

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.98

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.23

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-0.56

+0.53

NERD vs. BJK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NERD Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the BJK Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NERD and BJK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NERDBJKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-0.21

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

-0.29

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.05

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between NERD and BJK is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NERD vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison

NERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than BJK's 3.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
0.73%0.63%1.74%1.07%0.69%0.02%1.05%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
3.95%3.34%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%

Drawdowns

NERD vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NERD drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, smaller than the maximum BJK drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NERD and BJK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NERDBJKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-71.12%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.67%

-26.40%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.29%

-43.48%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.90%

-33.66%

-10.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.69%

-24.48%

-11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.39%

11.13%

+1.26%

Volatility

NERD vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 7.04%. This indicates that NERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NERDBJKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

7.04%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

13.39%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.85%

21.82%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.66%

24.49%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

25.03%

+0.68%