NEMG vs. WTIU
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU).
NEMG and WTIU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NEMG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025. WTIU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). It was launched on Feb 16, 2023.
Performance
NEMG vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEMG vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 16.47% | 27.79% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 113.23% | -10.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 113.23% return.
NEMG
- 1D
- 10.32%
- 1M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- 16.47%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -11.84%
- 1M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 113.23%
- 6M
- 89.84%
- 1Y
- 46.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEMG vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEMG vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
NEMG
WTIU
NEMG vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEMG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | -0.05 | +1.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMG and WTIU is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NEMG vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEMG nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NEMG vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and WTIU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -75.73% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.85% | -24.42% | -7.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -39.49% | +25.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.53% | — |
Volatility
NEMG vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEMG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.29% | 81.69% | +20.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.29% | 69.54% | +32.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.29% | 69.54% | +32.75% |