NEMG vs. UNHU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.

Performance

NEMG vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NEMG

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -3.03%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 19.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNHU

• 1D: 10.16%
• 1M: 17.42%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMG vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	7.20%
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	105.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and UNHU is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	-0.00

Return for Risk

NEMG vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMG	UNHU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	57.76	-57.17

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and UNHU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMG	UNHU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	-11.68%	-39.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.20%	-2.71%	-38.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-2.99%	-17.87%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMG	UNHU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.99%	69.61%	+30.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.99%	69.61%	+30.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.99%	69.61%	+30.38%

NEMG vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMG vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NEMG nor UNHU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMG and UNHU in my portfolio?

NEMG and UNHU have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMG or UNHU?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMG or UNHU?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMG or UNHU?

NEMG and UNHU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NEMG and UNHU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 0.97% for UNHU.