PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMG vs. UNHU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEMG vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NEMG

1D
-4.55%
1M
-15.30%
6M
-43.92%
YTD
-28.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNHU

1D
1.82%
1M
10.53%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMG vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and UNHU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEMG vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEMG vs. UNHU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and UNHU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMGUNHUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-11.68%

-46.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.31%

-0.94%

-57.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-2.64%

-23.24%

Volatility

NEMG vs. UNHU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMGUNHUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.38%

62.66%

+37.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.38%

62.66%

+37.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.38%

62.66%

+37.72%

NEMG vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEMG vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison

NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEMG and UNHU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

UNHU has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 0.97% for UNHU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEMG and UNHU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer