NEMG vs. ILS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

NEMG vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -28.76% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.92% return.

NEMG

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: -15.30%
• 6M: -43.92%
• YTD: -28.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.97%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 1Y: 7.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMG vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-28.76%	22.87%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	2.92%	0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and ILS is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

NEMG vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 97
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMG vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEMG	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.68	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	13.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	50.81	—

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMG	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.31%	-2.46%	-55.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.31%	0.00%	-58.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-0.52%	-25.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMG	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.38%	2.50%	+97.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.38%	3.72%	+96.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.38%	3.72%	+96.66%

NEMG vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMG vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.

Position	TTM	2025
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.18%	6.06%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMG and ILS in my portfolio?

NEMG and ILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMG or ILS?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMG or ILS?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMG or ILS?

ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

What is the main difference between NEMG and ILS?

NEMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.58% for ILS.