NEMD vs. HDV
NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. NEMD is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
NEMD vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 13.95% return.
NEMD
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 13.95%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
NEMD vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.64% | 7.10% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 13.95% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMD and HDV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMD vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
NEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDV
NEMD vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMD vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -37.04% | +32.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.46% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -3.08% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
NEMD vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.63% | 9.93% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 12.81% | -6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 15.73% | -9.10% |
NEMD vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMD vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than HDV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 4.73% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMD and HDV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.
NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.90% for HDV.
NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.08% for HDV.
Find the right allocation for NEMD and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer