NEMD vs. ENFR
NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. NEMD is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
NEMD vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 28.27% return.
NEMD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.27M | $3.93M | $3.16M | |
| $328.32K | $489.11K | $564.01K |
NEMD vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.47% | 7.10% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 28.27% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMD and ENFR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMD vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
NEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
NEMD vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMD vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -68.28% | +63.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -2.57% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -15.83% | +15.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
NEMD vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMD | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44% | 15.24% | -8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 19.19% | -12.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 24.65% | -18.21% |
NEMD vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMD vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than ENFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.91% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 5.81% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMD and ENFR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.
NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 3.91% for ENFR.
NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for NEMD and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer