PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEM vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 11.35%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.


NEM

1D
1.77%
1M
-5.47%
6M
-16.98%
YTD
-4.69%
1Y
57.44%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
11.35%

XLE

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.33%
6M
22.84%
YTD
29.13%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
22.22%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-4.69%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.13%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and XLE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.27

The correlation between NEM and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEM vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEMXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.23

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

6.04

-1.60

NEM vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEM vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-71.26%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.39%

-14.98%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-20.14%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

-26.04%

-36.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

-66.81%

+4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.88%

-8.31%

-19.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-17.95%

-23.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.98%

5.53%

+7.45%

Volatility

NEM vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.06%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

7.06%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.33%

16.68%

+20.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.80%

21.02%

+26.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.18%

25.91%

+12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.73%

29.58%

+6.15%

Dividends

NEM vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than XLE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.08%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEM and XLE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to XLE (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEM and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer