NEM vs. VRT
NEM (Newmont Corporation) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, NEM returned 10.33%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEM vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
NEM
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 36.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NEM vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | -0.43% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -4.82% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and VRT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.10 |
The correlation between NEM and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NEM:
$6.34
VRT:
$3.99
NEM:
15.62
VRT:
75.41
NEM:
0.41
VRT:
0.33
NEM:
4.77
VRT:
10.84
NEM:
$17.23B
VRT:
$10.84B
NEM:
$8.97B
VRT:
$3.92B
NEM:
$13.78B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEM vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
NEM
VRT
NEM vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 6.53 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.94 | 18.20 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.79 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 1.03 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.00 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
NEM vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -71.24% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -24.78% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.57% | -61.28% | +24.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.40% | -71.24% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.65% | -20.11% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -16.22% | -25.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 8.89% | +1.33% |
Volatility
NEM vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Newmont Corporation (NEM) is 14.19%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that NEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.19% | 16.60% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.93% | 45.55% | -8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.87% | 58.11% | -11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.83% | 61.81% | -23.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 54.61% | -19.02% |
Dividends
NEM vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.03% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NEM vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEM and VRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to NEM (14.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEM and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer