NEM vs. ALL
NEM (Newmont Corporation) and ALL (The Allstate Corporation) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ALL operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, NEM returned 13.46%/yr vs 14.79%/yr for ALL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEM vs. ALL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ALL's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has underperformed ALL with an annualized return of 13.46%, while ALL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.
NEM
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 36.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
ALL
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
NEM vs. ALL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | -0.43% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 4.37% | 10.09% | 40.61% | 6.37% | 18.37% | 9.86% | -0.12% | 38.82% | -19.52% | 43.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and ALL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1993 | 0.07 |
The correlation between NEM and ALL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NEM:
$6.34
ALL:
$45.76
NEM:
15.62
ALL:
4.70
NEM:
0.41
ALL:
0.13
NEM:
4.77
ALL:
0.85
NEM:
$17.23B
ALL:
$67.14B
NEM:
$8.97B
ALL:
$19.06B
NEM:
$13.78B
ALL:
$13.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEM vs. ALL — Risk / Return Rank
NEM
ALL
NEM vs. ALL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and The Allstate Corporation (ALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEM | ALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.06 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 0.52 | +2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.94 | 1.33 | +7.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEM | ALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.25 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.50 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.37 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
NEM vs. ALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than ALL's maximum drawdown of -77.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and ALL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEM | ALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -77.03% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -11.48% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.57% | -14.11% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.40% | -27.35% | -35.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.40% | -41.39% | -21.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.65% | -3.75% | -20.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -16.44% | -24.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 4.81% | +5.41% |
Volatility
NEM vs. ALL - Volatility Comparison
Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to The Allstate Corporation (ALL) at 8.09%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEM | ALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.19% | 8.09% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.93% | 17.07% | +19.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.87% | 23.82% | +23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.83% | 25.44% | +12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 24.94% | +10.65% |
Dividends
NEM vs. ALL - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than ALL's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.75% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 1.41% | 1.78% | 1.93% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.03% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
NEM vs. ALL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and The Allstate Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEM and ALL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to ALL (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs ALL's -77.03%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEM and ALL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer