PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFJX vs. LGRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund (NEFJX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFJX achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than LGRRX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFJX has underperformed LGRRX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while LGRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return.


NEFJX

1D
1.39%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
8.09%
6M
7.27%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
10.00%

LGRRX

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.44%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.58%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
16.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFJX
Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund
8.09%12.15%4.56%24.82%-10.19%30.44%8.93%24.67%-15.16%6.32%
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-0.34%13.76%34.82%50.89%-28.03%18.40%31.40%31.41%-2.80%32.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFJX and LGRRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between NEFJX and LGRRX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFJX vs. LGRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFJX
NEFJX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NEFJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LGRRX
LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund (NEFJX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFJXLGRRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

0.92

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.37

+1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

0.86

+2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.29

2.58

+8.71

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the LGRRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFJX and LGRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFJXLGRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.92

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.57

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.79

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.37

+0.06

Drawdowns

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFJX drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LGRRX drawdown of -64.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFJX and LGRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFJXLGRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-64.70%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-17.93%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-27.84%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-34.85%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.97%

-34.85%

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-3.70%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.21%

-21.24%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

5.80%

-2.92%

Volatility

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund (NEFJX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) at 4.13%. This indicates that NEFJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFJXLGRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.13%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

13.30%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

16.86%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

22.88%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

21.04%

+0.99%

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFJX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGRRX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFJX vs. LGRRX - Dividend Comparison

NEFJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than LGRRX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.51%2.50%6.30%6.70%18.14%5.13%4.60%2.68%5.92%2.33%1.38%0.42%
NEFJX
Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund
7.71%5.82%1.42%0.29%5.96%21.29%0.55%0.70%27.90%12.20%7.42%16.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFJX and LGRRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFJX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to LGRRX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFJX dropped -65.58% vs LGRRX's -64.70%.

NEFJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFJX and LGRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer