NEFJX vs. LSGRX
NEFJX (Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund) and LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NEFJX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Natixis, while LSGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, NEFJX returned 10.00%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for LSGRX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NEFJX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for LSGRX.
Performance
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEFJX achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFJX has underperformed LSGRX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while LSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.
NEFJX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
LSGRX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 12.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFJX Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund | 8.09% | 12.15% | 4.56% | 24.82% | -10.19% | 30.44% | 8.93% | 24.67% | -15.16% | 6.32% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -0.24% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEFJX and LSGRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NEFJX and LSGRX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEFJX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
NEFJX
LSGRX
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund (NEFJX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEFJX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 0.94 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 1.39 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 0.89 | +2.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 2.66 | +8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEFJX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.94 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEFJX drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LSGRX drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFJX and LSGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEFJX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -63.63% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -17.83% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.88% | -27.33% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.88% | -34.69% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.97% | -34.69% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -3.57% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -17.96% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 5.76% | -2.88% |
Volatility
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison
Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund (NEFJX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) at 4.15%. This indicates that NEFJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEFJX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.15% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 13.28% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 16.84% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 22.66% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 20.93% | +1.10% |
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEFJX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEFJX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison
NEFJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than LSGRX's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.22% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
NEFJX Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund | 7.71% | 5.82% | 1.42% | 0.29% | 5.96% | 21.29% | 0.55% | 0.70% | 27.90% | 12.20% | 7.42% | 16.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEFJX and LSGRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEFJX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to LSGRX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFJX dropped -65.58% vs LSGRX's -63.63%.
NEFJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEFJX and LSGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer