PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFHX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFHX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


NEFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
4.54%

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
1.37%7.59%8.77%9.53%-13.67%2.87%8.18%11.95%-3.47%5.77%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFHX and XILSX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

-0.01

The correlation between NEFHX and XILSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFHX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFHX
NEFHX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NEFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFHXXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-78.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

43.21

-41.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

117.99

-114.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

805.46

-793.41

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFHX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFHXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

8.17

-6.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

3.29

-2.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.63

-1.21

Drawdowns

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFHX drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFHX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFHXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-14.53%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-0.21%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-2.36%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-6.27%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-4.91%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.03%

+0.77%

Volatility

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that NEFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFHXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.43%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.11%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

3.08%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

3.77%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.14%

3.93%

+2.21%

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFHX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFHX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

NEFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
4.47%4.79%6.92%7.56%5.97%4.27%5.14%4.93%4.91%4.42%3.32%5.93%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFHX and XILSX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFHX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFHX dropped -43.09% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFHX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer