PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFHX vs. FHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFHX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFHX has underperformed FHYSX with an annualized return of 4.14%, while FHYSX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.


NEFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.57%
6M
0.32%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
4.14%
ALL TIME*
3.92%

FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.77%
6M
0.77%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
4.94%
ALL TIME*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
1.10%7.59%8.77%9.53%-13.67%2.87%8.18%11.95%-3.47%7.50%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
0.96%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFHX and FHYSX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between NEFHX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFHX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEFHX
NEFHX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NEFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFHXFHYSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.12

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

10.39

-3.53

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFHX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFHX drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than FHYSX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFHX and FHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFHXFHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-21.45%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.44%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-3.64%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-16.93%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

-21.45%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.93%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-2.56%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.50%

+0.09%

Volatility

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) at 0.53%. This indicates that NEFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFHXFHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.53%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

2.67%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

3.40%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

5.24%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.09%

5.72%

+0.37%

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFHX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFHX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

NEFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than FHYSX's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
5.84%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
5.10%4.79%6.92%7.56%5.97%4.27%5.14%4.93%4.91%4.42%3.32%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFHX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFHX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to FHYSX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFHX dropped -43.09% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFHX and FHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer