PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFHX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFHX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.68% return.


NEFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.64%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
4.52%

FQTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.62%
YTD
3.68%
6M
3.92%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
1.37%7.59%8.77%9.53%-13.67%2.87%8.18%4.84%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.68%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFHX and FQTIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.73

The correlation between NEFHX and FQTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFHX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFHX
NEFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NEFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFHXFQTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.69

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

4.38

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

23.00

-12.76

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFHX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFHX drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFHX and FQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFHXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-24.62%

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.20%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-6.42%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-18.81%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.24%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-4.29%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.42%

+0.16%

Volatility

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund (NEFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.82%. This indicates that NEFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFHXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.82%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.44%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

3.13%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

5.94%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.13%

7.70%

-1.57%

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFHX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFHX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than FQTIX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.84%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEFHX
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund
4.47%4.79%6.92%7.56%5.97%4.27%5.14%4.93%4.91%4.42%3.32%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFHX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFHX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to FQTIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFHX dropped -43.09% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFHX and FQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer