NEBX vs. RGTU
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
NEBX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 496.81% return, which is significantly higher than RGTU's -27.08% return.
NEBX
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- 97.88%
- YTD
- 496.81%
- 6M
- 272.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 46.09%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 6M
- -62.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 496.81% | -43.34% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -27.08% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and RGTU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEBX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.22 | 0.16 | +2.06 |
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -96.96% | +18.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -91.85% | +88.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -62.33% | +21.61% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.59% | 219.22% | -26.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 219.22% | -26.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 219.22% | -26.63% |
NEBX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NEBX and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
NEBX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
NEBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 28.29% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEBX and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for NEBX.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer