PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEBX vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEBX vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 130.64% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.05% return.


NEBX

1D
1.88%
1M
-36.57%
6M
136.60%
YTD
130.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PLTG

1D
1.90%
1M
-11.61%
6M
-44.23%
YTD
-63.05%
1Y
-58.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.98M$74.66M$85.72M
$2.36M$3.34M$5.05M

NEBX vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NEBX
Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
130.64%-37.72%
PLTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF
-63.05%14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NEBX and PLTG is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEBX vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEBX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEBX vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEBXPLTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

NEBX vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEBX vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -78.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTG drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEBXPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.64%

-80.11%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.50%

-74.89%

+8.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-35.51%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.28%

Volatility

NEBX vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEBXPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

209.85%

104.68%

+105.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

209.85%

105.88%

+103.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

209.85%

105.88%

+103.97%

NEBX vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEBX vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

NEBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.09%.


PositionTTM2025
NEBX
Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
PLTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF
49.09%18.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEBX and PLTG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.00% for NEBX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 0.75% for PLTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEBX and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer