NEBX vs. LULG
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
NEBX vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEBX achieves a 496.81% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -68.58% return.
NEBX
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- 97.88%
- YTD
- 496.81%
- 6M
- 272.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -68.58%
- 6M
- -60.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 496.81% | -55.83% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -68.58% | 47.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and LULG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEBX | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.22 | -0.87 | +3.09 |
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -73.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -73.18% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -70.90% | +67.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -33.71% | -7.01% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.59% | 85.42% | +107.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 85.42% | +107.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 85.42% | +107.17% |
NEBX vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and LULG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NEBX.
NEBX and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer