NEBX vs. LITX
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
NEBX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NEBX
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- 97.88%
- YTD
- 496.81%
- 6M
- 272.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 356.10% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 335.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and LITX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.22 | 32.05 | -29.83 |
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -51.46% | -26.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -25.05% | +21.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -14.60% | -26.12% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.59% | 198.92% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 198.92% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.59% | 198.92% | -6.33% |
NEBX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and LITX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEBX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEBX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
NEBX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer