NEBX vs. LITX
NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
NEBX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NEBX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -20.39%
- 6M
- 172.18%
- YTD
- 268.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -28.95%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEBX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 220.84% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 210.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEBX and LITX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEBX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEBX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEBX drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEBX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -62.15% | -15.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.47% | -50.74% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -20.65% | -18.28% |
Volatility
NEBX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.59% | 194.23% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.59% | 194.23% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.59% | 194.23% | +1.36% |
NEBX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEBX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEBX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEBX and LITX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEBX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEBX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
NEBX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NEBX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for NEBX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer