NEAR vs. SLV
NEAR (iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - NEAR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. NEAR is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NEAR returned 2.85%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEAR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
NEAR vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAR has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 2.85%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
NEAR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
NEAR vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 0.73% | 5.90% | 5.09% | 7.42% | 0.41% | 0.32% | 1.39% | 3.55% | 1.71% | 1.41% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAR and SLV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2013 | 0.11 |
NEAR vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NEAR
SLV
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
NEAR
SLV
-
Basic Materials
NEAR
-
SLV
Consumer Cyclical
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Energy
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Industrials
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Real Estate
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Technology
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Utilities
NEAR
-
SLV
-
Communication Services
NEAR
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEAR vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
NEAR
SLV
NEAR vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEAR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.35 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 2.62 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.49 | 5.64 | +11.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEAR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.89 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.90 | 0.58 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.49 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.25 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
NEAR vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -76.28% | +66.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -42.45% | +41.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.16% | -42.45% | +41.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.32% | -42.45% | +41.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.61% | -42.81% | +33.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -37.30% | +37.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -44.67% | +44.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 19.67% | -19.42% |
Volatility
NEAR vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) is 0.37%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that NEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEAR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 16.30% | -15.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.00% | 58.31% | -57.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 58.90% | -57.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.34% | 36.15% | -34.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 31.84% | -29.34% |
NEAR vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEAR vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.44% | 4.54% | 5.00% | 4.59% | 1.78% | 0.76% | 1.53% | 2.69% | 2.25% | 1.52% | 1.07% | 0.85% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEAR and SLV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to NEAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 2.85% for NEAR. On fees, NEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
NEAR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SLV is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NEAR and 0.50% for SLV.
NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEAR and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer