PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAR vs. MYCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAR vs. MYCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than MYCF's 1.63% return.


NEAR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
2.85%

MYCF

1D
0.04%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAR vs. MYCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.73%5.90%0.12%
MYCF
State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
1.63%5.12%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAR and MYCF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.42

The correlation between NEAR and MYCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAR vs. MYCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MYCF
MYCF Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MYCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAR vs. MYCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEARMYCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

3.22

-1.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

38.53

-34.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

164.09

-146.60

NEAR vs. MYCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is lower than the MYCF Sharpe Ratio of 6.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAR and MYCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEARMYCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

6.98

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

4.12

-3.04

Drawdowns

NEAR vs. MYCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than MYCF's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and MYCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARMYCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-0.60%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-0.12%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.03%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.03%

+0.22%

Volatility

NEAR vs. MYCF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) at 0.15%. This indicates that NEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARMYCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.15%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

0.43%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

0.66%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.34%

1.09%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.50%

1.09%

+1.41%

NEAR vs. MYCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MYCF's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NEAR vs. MYCF - Dividend Comparison

NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, which matches MYCF's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MYCF
State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.50%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.44%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAR and MYCF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAR has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to MYCF (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs MYCF's -0.60%.

On 1-year performance, MYCF leads with 4.60% vs 4.31% for NEAR. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYCF has performed better with a 4.60% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 4.40% for MYCF.

NEAR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while MYCF is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NEAR and 0.15% for MYCF.

MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.98 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAR and MYCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer