PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAR vs. CGSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAR vs. CGSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NEAR having a 0.73% return and CGSD slightly lower at 0.70%.


NEAR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
2.85%

CGSD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAR vs. CGSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.73%5.90%5.09%7.42%1.09%
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
0.70%6.11%5.46%5.03%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAR and CGSD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.67

The correlation between NEAR and CGSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAR vs. CGSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CGSD
CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAR vs. CGSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEARCGSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.61

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.88

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

18.36

-0.87

NEAR vs. CGSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the CGSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAR and CGSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEARCGSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.94

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

2.41

-1.32

Drawdowns

NEAR vs. CGSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than CGSD's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and CGSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARCGSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-1.75%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-1.11%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.16%

-1.11%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.14%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.28%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.23%

+0.02%

Volatility

NEAR vs. CGSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) is 0.37%, while Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) has a volatility of 0.39%. This indicates that NEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARCGSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.39%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

1.01%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

1.47%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.34%

2.16%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.50%

2.16%

+0.34%

NEAR vs. CGSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NEAR and CGSD have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NEAR vs. CGSD - Dividend Comparison

NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, which matches CGSD's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
4.46%4.48%4.57%4.43%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.44%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAR and CGSD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGSD has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to NEAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs CGSD's -1.75%.

On 3-year performance, NEAR leads with 5.64% vs 5.21% for CGSD. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NEAR has performed better with a 5.64% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NEAR and CGSD have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 4.44% for NEAR.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group.

NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAR and CGSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer