PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. VFPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Private Capital Management Value Fund (VFPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 59.55% return, which is significantly higher than VFPIX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed VFPIX with an annualized return of 22.51%, while VFPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.


NEAGX

1D
3.25%
1M
17.09%
YTD
59.55%
6M
61.01%
1Y
96.36%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
23.60%
10Y*
22.51%

VFPIX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.91%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
59.55%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
VFPIX
Private Capital Management Value Fund
0.86%-0.05%31.32%7.12%-1.18%36.37%14.00%16.86%-9.40%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and VFPIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.75

The correlation between NEAGX and VFPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. VFPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VFPIX
VFPIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VFPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VFPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Private Capital Management Value Fund (VFPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEAGXVFPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.13

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.20

0.93

+6.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.00

2.46

+26.55

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is higher than the VFPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and VFPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEAGXVFPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

0.71

+3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.42

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.51

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.52

+0.14

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum VFPIX drawdown of -52.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and VFPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXVFPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-52.37%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-13.74%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-22.75%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-22.75%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-52.37%

+16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.47%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-7.88%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

5.12%

-1.65%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Private Capital Management Value Fund (VFPIX) at 4.00%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXVFPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

4.00%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.45%

13.09%

+7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81%

17.83%

+7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

21.11%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.15%

23.12%

+1.03%

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than VFPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. VFPIX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than VFPIX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.34%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%
VFPIX
Private Capital Management Value Fund
2.12%2.14%8.91%0.64%3.39%13.37%12.63%20.74%20.32%1.30%1.42%6.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAGX and VFPIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to VFPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs VFPIX's -52.37%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and VFPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer